Founder-led War Rooms, Reliability Investigations, and Security Audits for teams shipping with Claude Code, Cursor, and Codex. We trace ownership, lifecycle, security, cleanup, and correctness failures left behind by AI-assisted delivery — then deliver severity-ranked findings, remediation specs, and merge-ready PRs.
Early access · Founder-reviewed · Scoped repo access · NDA on request
You ask for a feature. The agent delivers it — in the most locally convenient way, not the most structurally correct one. The request is fulfilled while the codebase quietly gets harder to change, harder to secure, and harder to trust.
Each session optimizes for the request in front of it. None of them carry the memory of what the other 50 sessions changed this week.
The workflow that created the drift usually will not expose it systematically.
Most tools help you write the change. Ad Actum verifies what it did to the system.
One disciplined pipeline, three clean outputs. Every finding verified against your code. Every spec bounded. Every fix delivered as a PR your owner can review and merge.
Exact file paths. Reproduction and blast radius. Every claim verified against the actual code — not heuristics, not scanner patterns.
Each finding becomes a remediation spec with acceptance criteria. What to change, where, and why — written for implementation.
Ad Actum implements the fix, reviews it, and opens a PR against your repo. Your owner reviews and merges. No TODO list — the work is done.
Architecture and lifecycle audit. Ownership gaps, coupling, module boundaries, dead modules, and structural hotspots — surfaced and routed to a remediation path.
Active bugs, correctness failures, races, stale state, data integrity gaps, and cleanup or recovery failures — traced to root cause and fixed.
Vulnerabilities, attack chains, unsafe trust boundaries, and fail-open controls. Remediation-ready fixes. Architecture and reliability are ignored unless inseparable from a security fix.
Each finding is real, redacted, and delivered as a pull request. The outcome line names the remediation PR delivered for that finding.
One schema out of 38 had no crId/projectId fields and was never reachable from the canonical CR teardown sweep. Every analysis run left permanent orphans behind, silently.
Delivered: crId/projectId fields + cleanup collection coverage PR.
Ownership was enforced on parent resources. Child-resource controllers inherited the auth check but not the ownership filter — authenticated users could read, modify, and delete other tenants' data across 30+ endpoints.
Delivered: ProjectOwnershipGuard + service-layer projectId scoping PR.
One handler explicitly rejected query-param tokens — the team knew it was dangerous. A privileged media surface accepted them, turning browser history, proxy logs, and referrer headers into credential leaks.
Delivered: Bearer media fetch + query-token rejection PR.
Tell us the repo, stack, pain, and risk area. We review every application before opening a study.
One subsystem, access model, and timeline. Scoped repo access, NDA available, no broad production access required.
Study + implementation. Findings are verified against code, specs are bounded, fixes are implemented and reviewed.
PR delivered against your repo. Report and debrief handed over. Your owner reviews and merges.
Ad Actum runs as a founder-reviewed service. Access is scoped, secrets stay out unless explicitly in scope, and every change lands as a reviewable PR.
“I kept being called after the PR merged. The bug was usually old — AI just made it cheaper to write and harder to see.”
Ad Actum is founder-led, productized delivery. Each study ends with the same discipline: severity-ranked findings, a bounded remediation spec, and a PR your owner can review and land when implementation is in scope.
One subsystem. One founder-reviewed study. One merge-ready PR. Tell us about the repo and the pain you want investigated — we review every application before opening a study.
Early access · scoped after review. NDA available. Secrets excluded unless explicitly in scope.